This page is a running log of state and local legislation aimed at institutional or large-investor ownership of single-family homes. We update it as states act, one dated entry at a time, and we only log what we can source. If a rumor is circulating and you do not see it here, that means we could not verify it yet.
Why keep this tracker at all? Because the federal fight is over and the state fights are not. The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act became law on July 11, 20261, its purchase ban takes effect January 7, 20272, and we expect state and local copycat legislation to be the next front. Congress drew its line at 350 homes with affiliate aggregation3. Nothing obligates a state to draw its line in the same place, and as you will see below, none of them have.
Three things are worth watching in every state bill. First, the threshold. The states are experimenting with 500, 100, 50, and in some drafts zero. Second, the mechanism. The federal Act is a purchase ban; states are also trying punitive taxes, denial of tax deductions, waiting periods, and disclosure regimes, each of which reaches grandfathered portfolios in ways the federal ban does not. Third, enforcement. A private right of action, as Georgia attempted, produces very different litigation risk than an agency penalty. Our position, stated plainly: a state law at 50 or 100 homes would matter more to most readers of this journal than the federal Act does, because the federal 350-home line3 leaves nearly every independent operator untouched.
How to read this tracker
Each state gets its own heading. Each entry starts with the date we checked and a status: enacted, passed one chamber, introduced, or died. We distinguish statute from pending bill every time, and a bill that died stays on the page, because dead bills get reintroduced and the sponsor's next draft usually starts where the last one stopped. Details reflect the bill text or reporting as of the date shown, not what a bill might become in committee.
New York
August 2026. Enacted. New York is the first state with a copycat regime on the books, and it took a different shape than the federal ban. Budget legislation signed in May 2025 makes it unlawful, as of July 1, 2025, for certain institutional purchasers that own ten or more one- or two-family homes to buy or offer to buy a one- or two-family home unless it has been publicly listed for at least 90 days4, with penalties up to $250,0004. The same legislation denies those investors state tax deductions for depreciation and interest4 on those homes. Note the threshold: ten homes, not 350.
Washington
August 2026. Passed one chamber, then stalled. Senate Bill 5496 would prohibit investment entities above an ownership threshold from acquiring additional single-family homes5, with exceptions for code compliance work and adding units, enforced through the state Consumer Protection Act. Introduced at 25 homes, amended to 100. It passed the Senate 29 to 19 on February 13, 2026, but was returned to the Senate Rules Committee on March 12, 20266 without a House floor vote before the session ended. We expect a return in 2027.
Georgia
August 2026. Passed one chamber, then died. Senate Bill 463, from a Republican sponsor, would have capped corporate ownership at 500 single-family rental homes statewide7, grandfathering existing holdings and enforcing the cap through private lawsuits. It passed the Senate 49 to 3, then a House committee stripped the language8 and the session ended without it. A companion effort, House Bill 1228, would have roughly doubled property tax assessments for owners of 1,000 or more rental homes9; it died in committee. A 49 to 3 Senate vote is not a fluke. Georgia will be back.
Minnesota
August 2026. Introduced. House File 2687 pairs two mechanisms, per the House Research bill summary10: a ban on private equity companies holding any interest in a single-family home (counted to include duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes), and a 50-home cap for other corporate owners. Reporting puts civil penalties at up to $25,000 per property held above the cap11. The same sponsor filed a corporate-ownership bill, HF 685, in the prior biennium12 that covered similar ground. A 50-home cap is the lowest general threshold in any active bill we are tracking.
Ohio
August 2026. Introduced. Senate Bill 28, a bipartisan bill, would impose a $2,000 per month tax on each home owned by a landlord with 50 or more single-family homes in one county13, with exemptions for nonprofits and land banks. It has not had a floor vote. Watch the tax mechanism here: a recurring per-home tax hits grandfathered portfolios, which the federal purchase ban deliberately does not.
California
August 2026. Passed one chamber, then died. Assembly Bill 1240 would have barred institutional investors owning more than 1,000 single-family homes from purchasing additional homes to convert into rentals14. It passed the Assembly on June 3, 2025, and died in a Senate committee15. The politics have not settled: the governor has since proposed his own restrictions on large investors16.
Nebraska
August 2026. Died. Legislative Bill 1405 would have prohibited corporations and hedge funds from purchasing a single-family home unless the entity is domiciled in Nebraska with resident principal members17. It drew no opposition testimony at its 2024 hearing but did not advance before the session ended. We include it because the residency mechanism, an outright ban on out-of-state entity purchases, is the most aggressive design any state has floated.
What would change our analysis
The tracker starts with one enacted law and a handful of near misses, and we want to be plain that this is the honest state of play, not a preview of a longer secret list. But the pattern across these entries is consistent: every state number is far below the federal 3503. New York regulates at ten homes. Minnesota and Ohio draft at 50. Washington passed a chamber at 100. If any of those becomes law, owners who are bystanders under the federal Act, which sunsets January 7, 204218 and leaves the sub-350 transitional window open until January 7, 20292, become regulated parties under state law. That is the event this page exists to catch early, and it is the reason we check the count in your state, not just Washington, D.C.
If you want an email when a state on this page moves, or a new state joins it, subscribe to tracker updates. One message per update, nothing else.
Cited in this article
18 SOURCES- Mayer Brown: Housing Legislation Banning Large Institutional Investors from Purchasing Single-Family Homes Becomes Lawmayerbrown.com
- Goodwin: Impact to Institutional Investment in the SFR Rental Marketgoodwinlaw.com
- National Law Review: Implications for Large Institutional Investorsnatlawreview.com
- Greenberg Traurig: New York Budget Law May Discourage Institutional Ownership of Single and Two-Family Homesgtlaw.com
- The Center Square: Backers, critics debate bill to stop major investors from buying up single-family homesthecentersquare.com
- Washington State Legislature: SB 5496 Bill Summaryapp.leg.wa.gov
- The Current: Georgia bill seeks to limit corporate ownership of single-family rental homesthecurrentga.org
- The Current: Georgia lawmakers went after corporate landlords. They did not get farthecurrentga.org
- Atlanta Civic Circle: Crossover Day leaves one good shot at reining in mega-homebuyersatlantaciviccircle.org
- Minnesota House Research: Bill Summary H.F. 2687house.mn.gov
- FOX 9: Home purchase limits for private equity corporations proposed under new billfox9.com
- Minnesota House Research: Bill Summary H.F. 685house.mn.gov
- 13abc: New tax proposed on Ohio landlords who own 50+ houses per county13abc.com
- Assemblymember Alex Lee: Bill to Ban Corporate-Owned Single-Family Home Rentals Passes Assemblylee.asmdc.org
- ABC10: California bill limiting corporate homeownership dies as federal effort stallsabc10.com
- CalMatters: Gavin Newsom joins Trump in blaming big investors for housing crisiscalmatters.org
- Nebraska Examiner: Lawmaker wants to keep out-of-state entities from buying single-family homes in Nebraskanebraskaexaminer.com
- Congress.gov: H.R. 6644, 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, Sec. 1001(f)congress.gov